The Interruptions That Keep Coming.
The Deeper Tension.
Kenya’s emerging Virtual Asset Service Providers framework adds another layer. High paid-up capital requirements risk pricing out exactly the kind of lean, non-custodial tools that serve people with the least margin for complexity. Fidel has been consistent in public remarks: Africa is not catching up to the rest of the world. In many ways it is writing its own blueprint for practical Bitcoin use. The question is whether the regulatory and operational environment will allow that blueprint to stay open to the person who only has M-Pesa and a basic phone.
Liquidity, payment-rail dependence, scam pressure, and rising capital barriers form a quiet cluster of friction. None of them is unique to Bitika. But because Bitika has chosen radical simplicity and non-custody, each interruption is felt more sharply by the very people the tool was designed to serve.
Why the Flickering Matters.
Self-custody only becomes real when the first step is reliable. When that step repeatedly goes offline, the distance between “Bitcoin is for everyone” and “Bitcoin is for those who can wait or afford alternatives” becomes visible. The interruptions are small in isolation. Taken together they reveal how thin the infrastructure still is for genuine everyday access.
Bitika continues to operate, continues to warn users about impersonators and continues to refuse to hold anyone’s keys. That honesty is part of its value. The pauses, however, keep asking a harder question of the wider ecosystem.
What happens to the promise of Bitcoin for ordinary Africans when the pipes that carry it remain fragile?
Fidel and every reader who has ever used or recommended Bitika: when the path that finally made self-custody reachable for the person with only mobile money keeps going offline, are we still building for the next billion, or are we quietly accepting that the first million will have to keep finding workarounds?